Disclaimer: please do keep in mind that my mind is constantly ransaked by philosophical questions. and i don't mind that, but some others do. :) i like the struggle of thought. there is much worth there. i'm convinced it grows the heart and mind, and rounds off the balance and wholeness of a person.
As i've been continually thinking about the messages that i'd like to prepare, and praying about which set(s) of words will bring God the most glory when said before the indian students training to be native missionaries - i find i am very convinced that a teacher should deeply know and experience his lesson. you can't teach something you haven't learned. at the very least, for the parties involved (learning and teaching), everyone is better off when the teacher knows and experiences his lesson.
QUESTIONS:
conflict then arises, battling in my the regions where my head and heart connect - a conflict over authorization. what i mean by authorization is: by what authority do i teach these sets of words? i think i know the answer, but i must tarry. because there's another question of mine - what authority says that i've sufficiently learned or experienced the lesson that i would like to teach?
THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE QUESTIONS:
these two questions are important to me - i guess because i know that i've been in possibly compromising teaching positions, in which i'm worried God wasn't honored, or glorified. i think i should note here that God's glory seems to motivate (i hope and pray dear Jesus) my worry over these questions.
SOME ANSWERS (SORT OF):
as Christians, we live this life in an "already, but not yet" state. we're already saved, but not yet (since we are also being saved); we already know God, but not yet (since His fullness is mysteriously and gloriously hidden from us); we already experience God, but not yet (since someday, we'll be in His presence). So this "holy limbo" (i don't know what to call it) relates to the teacher, because he already has authority, but not yet.
CAVEAT LECTOR (let the reader beware):
if i were reading this (as i just did), i might all of a sudden start getting worried (as i just did). did evan just question all authority by positing some "holy limbo" between "already" and "not yet"? i don't want to be misinterpreted - i very firmly believe that conclusions can, and should, be made in teaching. what a horrible epistemological state to be in, where we can only settle for limbo.
so i don't think the "already, but not yet" affects making conclusions - and herein lies the answer to my first question: i teach my sets of words by God's authority given in the perfection of His word. that's great! the authority isn't based on me or my standards. conclusions are established by God, in His word.
and the second question, well, i think that the "already, but not yet" affects that - but in a good way. and as i've written this, and thought about that - i feel more free given that. i can teach sets of words - the words are ordained by God through His prophets. i already know and already experience them. it is truth. but there is quite alot of space (representing potential, as far as i'm concerned) which i can grow into, which is the not yet aspect of my limbo. it's graceful to the teacher - not an excuse for erroror flippancy (we're not to receive God's grace in vain); it is both the authority of God's truth, and the patience of the Lord to further conform me to that truth.
2 Corinthians has been a great blessing to me concerning these questions, and so i think i'm going to teach out of some of those chapters along with my message on Ecclesiastes.
please pray for the health of our team today! and for safety in travel and eating!
may the love of Christ constrain us (2 Cor. 5:14),
evan